Resolution calling on the Commissioner of Citywide Administrative Services to implement the band scoring method for establishing eligible lists for competitive civil service titles.

Text

Res. No. 76 ..Title Resolution calling on the Commissioner of Citywide Administrative Services to implement the band scoring method for establishing eligible lists for competitive civil service titles. ..Body By Council Members Far�as and Louis Whereas, New York City (City) pioneered the development of the merit-based civil service exam, the gold standard of good government practice that has protected the civil service system for over a century; and Whereas, In 1885, New York became the first state to adopt a civil service system for its State workers with the passage of a merit-and-fitness requirement in the State constitution; and Whereas, The civil service exam assesses a candidate's potential job performance in a fair and competitive manner, and serves as the pathway into competitive civil service positions; and Whereas, While the exam system operates to safeguard the integrity of the civil service system, there are numerous opportunities to modernize the process while prioritizing equity and efficacy; and Whereas, To ensure the City remains a competitive employer and hires skilled civil servants, it is the responsibility of the Commissioner of Citywide Administrative Services to reform and streamline the exam process in order to support a continuous pipeline of qualified workers into City agencies; and Whereas, Exam scoring methodology is primed for reform; and Whereas, The State Civil Service Law restricts agency hiring decisions to a choice of the three highest-scoring candidates on a rank-ordered list, under what is known as the 1-in-3 rule; and Whereas, Tied scores are treated equally in listing, so more than three eligible candidates may be considered for appointment to an open competitive position; and Whereas, Other states have eliminated the 1-in-3 restriction altogether and adopted an alternative scoring method known as band scoring; and Whereas, Band scoring establishes statistically equivalent score ranges, such as 100-96, which signify that the point differential within a score range is not a meaningful difference in predicting the candidate's qualifications; and Whereas, Proponents of band scoring argue that the City should treat similarly candidates who have demonstrated equivalent merit and fitness in their raw examination scores, thereby maximizing the pools of qualified candidates and amplifying the opportunity for matches between candidates and hiring agencies; and Whereas, Band scoring would grant some discretion to the hiring manager to identify candidates who are best suited for the job, not simply those who perform the best on the exam; and Whereas, The use of this scoring method may be implemented under the Civil Service Law, and should be the preferred scoring method used by the Commissioner of Citywide Administrative Services; and Whereas, Government reform advocates endorse the band scoring technique; and Whereas, A 2011 Workforce Reform Taskforce, assembled by the former Bloomberg Administration, and a 2012 Capstone Team, assembled by the non-profit organization Citizens Union, both recommended that where sound and consistent with the City's rules, the City should adopt band scoring; and Whereas, Since its inception, the civil service system evolved to serve the City's best interests and to ensure the quality of the City's civil servants; and Whereas, Band scoring would promote equity and fairness by expanding civil service opportunities for a larger pool of eligible candidates; and Whereas, Band scoring would also promote more holistic consideration of eligible candidates and give hiring agencies a chance to find candidates of best fit; now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls on the Commissioner of Citywide Administrative Services to implement the band scoring method for establishing eligible lists for competitive civil service titles. Session 13 LS #11549 01/18/2024 Session 12 LS #11549 3/15/2023 EA

Full text · NYC Council